php[architect] logo

Want to check out an issue? Sign up to receive a special offer.

Fiendish Functions—Filtering Fact From Fiction

Posted by on May 25, 2021
By Camilo Payan

Functional programming is a paradigm that has gained in popularity recently with the rise of several new functional programming languages and integration of new features in existing languages. All the same, there are many concerns about functional programming in the developer community. Is functional programming useful for the PHP developer? Will it add complexity to my codebase? This article will respond to some of these misconceptions.

Get the Full Issue

This article was published in the March 2021 issue of php[architect] magazine. Download the Free Article PDF to see how it looks in the published magazine.

If you'd like more articles like this one, become a subscriber today!. You can get each monthly issue in digital and print options or buy individual issues.


To get the most out of this article, I hope you will take stock of what you currently know about functional programming, but complete knowledge isn’t necessary. Also, I assume the reader has some knowledge of object-oriented programming such as familiarity with SOLID design principles, and knowledge of PHP functionality such as callables, anonymous functions, and the array methods that take callables, like array_map(), array_filter(), and array_reduce(). With all that said, let’s dive in with the first myth I’d like to dispel.

Functional Programming is the Same as Imperative Programming

The first myth about functional programming is that it is an older pre-object-oriented programming style, where instructions are written one after the other as in a WordPress template. This myth, unfortunately, persists due to a lack of knowledge of the different programming paradigms that exist. Without that knowledge, every paradigm is usually organized in a coder’s mind as object-oriented or not object-oriented.

This myth is especially true in the PHP community with good reason. Those who worked in PHP in the early 2000s (and before) didn’t have the object-oriented features—interfaces, namespaces, and abstract classes, to name a few—that have organized PHP 5+ projects since, and that led to many projects bogged down in spaghetti code without clear borders between responsibilities. That history leads to the clear delineation of coders’ minds between the object-oriented approach and the “bad old way.”

However, functional programming is not a return to that old way of doing things. Functional programming takes as its center not the description of objects and their behaviors, but the description of functions and their inputs and outputs. Then those functions are applied and composed to create our system.

The main issue that crops up with code from before PHP 5’s release is that it lacked organization, focus, and clarity. Functional programming has an organizing principle that gives it focus and rules that make them explicit.

Functions in functional programming are fundamentally based on functions in mathematics. That is, something like f(x) where some math is done to a given input x, and the same result is returned every time for the same input. This goal in functional programming is known as writing pure functions. A pure function is any function where, given the same input, the same output is returned.

You might already be able to imagine some of the ramifications. Pure functions are necessarily protected from side effects since any reliance on a state outside the function would change the output—or they wouldn’t be pure functions. Without side effects, the inputs and outputs themselves must be immutable, that is that the function cannot change the input since this would be a side effect.

For example, if we had a function that took in a date and returned the next date, we might implement something like Listing 1.

Listing 1.

function nextDay(\DateTime $date) {
   $interval = new DateInterval('P1D');
   // Mutate the given date
   return $date->add($interval);

$date = new DateTime('August 12, 1791');
echo $date->format('F j, Y'); // August 13, 1791

However, this example mutates the input since PHP passes objects by reference, which could have ramifications in whatever code was using that date object in the first place. If we were to ensure that this function was pure, we would implement it as in Listing 2.

Listing 2.

function nextDay(\DateTime $date) {
   $interval = new DateInterval('P1D');
   $nextDay = clone $date;
   // Mutate the given date
   return $nextDay->add($interval);

$date = new DateTime('August 12, 1791');
$next = nextDay($date);
echo $date->format('F j, Y'); // August 13, 1791
echo $next->format('F j, Y'); // August 14, 1791

Here we create a new DateTime object and return the new date. The input is left intact, and the calling code doesn’t need to worry about handling a side effect. Actually, PHP has a set of immutable Date objects that we could use instead to implement as in Listing 3.

Listing 3.

function nextDay(DateTimeImmutable $date) {
   $interval = new DateInterval('P1D');
   // DateTimeImmutable makes a new object.
   return $date->add($interval);

$date = new DateTimeImmutable('August 12, 1791');
$next = nextDay($date);
echo $date->format('F j, Y'); // August 13, 1791
echo $next->format('F j, Y'); // August 14, 1791

Functional Programming is Impossible Without a Functional Language

Functional programming is only possible in a functional programming language. Those that discard functional programming in PHP on these grounds will point out that PHP is not a functional language like Haskell or OCaml. Without the foundation of a functional language, the paradigm is doomed to failure in a PHP context. This myth is believable because it has a grain of truth! Functional programming and its theoretical background in the lambda calculus (which we will not get into in this article) are the foundation of popular functional languages. At the same time, PHP will allow you to mix in bits of the functional programming paradigm as you like.

The issue here is one of definition. Every programming paradigm has vague definitions and fuzzy borders between them. If you ask five developers to define object-oriented programming, you’ll get six answers, seven book recommendations, and one intense desire to move to the woods. The same holds true for functional programming. There isn’t a strong definition.

We need to take a very loose definition for functional programming in PHP, which boils down to support for first-class lambda functions. We need functions that can be defined, passed around, applied, and composed at will.

“First class functions” refers to the ability to assign a function to a variable. This language feature supports the requirement that we be able to pass around a function. It has had first-class support in PHP since 2009 with the release of PHP 5.3.

// Assign a function to a variable
// This creates a Closure, assigned to $sum
$sum = function($a, $b) {
    return $a + $b;

// Call the function, using the variable name
echo $sum(5, 4); // 9

A “lambda function” is an anonymous function, which is to say that your function can be defined and used in your code without being given a name. This fulfills the requirement that functions can be defined anywhere in your code and is most commonly used in PHP as callbacks. Callbacks predated PHP 5.3 in some ways, such as call_user_func() using named functions. However, they were formalized further as a type in 2009 with 5.3. This also points to the ability to pass a function into another function. Similarly, we can use lambda functions to return a function from a function. See Listing 4.

Listing 4.

$names = ["John", "James"];

   // Anonymous Lambda function passed in as parameter.
   function ($n) {
      echo "Hello; $n";

While PHP is not a functional programming language, it is a general-purpose language that now supports multiple programming paradigms. We can use and apply functional programming principles to our code while using best practices to decide when to use which paradigm, much like we use experience and best practices to determine when to apply a design pattern.

Functional Programming Will Ruin My Object-Oriented Codebase

Since PHP 5, there has been a consistent push toward language features in PHP that support the best practices of object-oriented programming. It has led to many solid advances in PHP codebase organization and greater ease of library development. The PHP Framework Interoperability Group has worked to codify best practices in PHP while also supporting the various object-oriented frameworks like Symfony, Laravel, and Laminas.

When considering the functional programming paradigm’s advantages, a developer might think that they can’t combine the two. That choosing an object-oriented approach means that functional techniques are off the table. Since the world of PHP frameworks is entirely object-oriented, functional programming is a toy idea that we can’t use in existing projects. Nothing could be further than the truth. The two approaches to thinking about and writing code can supplement and improve each other.

Some of the most influential ideas around object-oriented programming today are the SOLID design principles. The SOLID design principles are a set of code smells that make object-oriented code challenging to work with and change over time. They are the single responsibility principle, the open/close principle, the Liskov substitution principle, the interface segregation principle, and the dependency inversion principle. Let’s go through these and see how a functional approach might help us accomplish their goals.

The Single Responsibility Principle

The idea of the single responsibility principle is that each class we write should have only one reason to change. If a class has more than one responsibility, that change becomes more burdensome. A change to one of your class’s responsibilities could affect your class’s other responsibilities, making your change more likely to introduce bugs.

Thinking in terms of lambda functions helps the single responsibility principle at the method/function level. Using lambda functions, we can break our code down into its smallest parts while pushing secondary responsibilities out to other objects or methods.

Let’s look at some code (Listing 5) that finds the largest product in a series of digits.

Listing 5.

function largestProduct(string $digits, int $len) {
   $factorsArray = [];

   for ($i = 0; $i <= strlen($digits) - $len; $i++) {
      $factorsArray[] = substr($digits, $i, $len);

   $productsArray = [];
   foreach ($factorsArray as $factors) {
      $productsArray[] = array_product(str_split($factors));

   return max($productsArray);

We can see that there are several responsibilities mixed here. I build the array of factors from the given series of digits. Then I get the products of each of those factors. These can all be turned into individual functions, as you can see in Listing 6.

Listing 6.

function largestProduct(string $digits, int $len) {
   return max(array_map(
      getFactors($digits, $len)

function getFactors(string $digits, int $len) {
   return array_map(
      fn ($i) => substr($digits, $i, $len),
      range(0, strlen($digits) - $len)

function getProduct(string $factors) {
   return array_product(str_split($factors));

Now we’ve refactored a bit, and each of our refactored functions does only one thing. This solution makes extensive use of PHP’s array functions, which are probably the most common use cases you’ll find for a functional programming mindset.

The Open/Closed Principle

The open/closed principle in object-oriented programming dictates that objects should be open for extension but closed for modification. The idea here is to help code changes by avoiding the brittleness that results from codebases where classes depend directly on other concrete classes, so a modification in a class to finish a feature request can result in unforeseen bugs in another one.

In practice, developers take this to mean that classes should depend on abstract classes or interfaces. Instead of needing new implementation details in your class for each concrete class that is supported, your class would rely on an abstraction. Then it could take in concrete classes that extend that abstraction or implement that interface without needing to change. In this way, you extend your class’s functionality without needing to be modified to support new feature requirements. However, if we expand our thinking on the open/closed principle to include functional programming concepts, we can see other ways to apply the open/closed principle.

Higher-order functions, that is, functions that can take other functions as inputs or return functions as outputs, are also open for extension while being closed for modification. Some of the best examples of this are already native PHP functions. The suite of array functions that take a function callback is all higher-order functions whose functionality is extended by the function you pass in. At the same time, you also are not able to modify the inner workings of that function.

Immutable objects are, by definition, completely closed to modification after their creation. Their internal state can’t be changed, and any method that does make a “change” actually creates a new immutable object. This is pretty far afield from the original definition of the open/closed principle, or even its interpretation as a dependence on abstraction. Still, immutability maintains an essential role in functional programming. Immutability helps support the creation of pure functions that don’t have side effects because immutable objects protect the programmer from creating side effects in the objects they’re using. In this way, we could see it as a natural alignment of goals under the open/closed principle.

The Liskov Substitution Principle

The Liskov substitution principle means that child classes should maintain the behavior of their parent classes. One of the byproducts of the Liskov substitution principle in current best practices is to avoid the inheritance hierarchies that this principle is meant to help you navigate entirely. You can see this in the proliferation of dependency injection libraries and the frameworks that use them.

Inheritance isn’t a part of functional programming. As stated earlier, functional programming is based on function composition: building behavior by combining other behaviors/functions. This is remarkably similar to the idea of dependency injection that programmers have turned to resolve the LSP’s demand.

Dependency Inversion Principle

The dependency inversion principle states that abstractions should not depend on details, and details should not depend on abstractions. In the object-oriented paradigm, we take this to mean that classes should separate high-level business logic from glue code by depending on interfaces or contracts instead of on concrete classes.

Again, we can look to higher-order functions, which can take a function as input and apply it. In this case, the interface is the function itself, and the implementation details are in the function. This is possible with first-class functions. The suite of array_* functions in the PHP standard library again shows a concrete example, where the implementation details of your filter or map function are left to you. In contrast, the higher-level functionality of applying that function across an array is contained in the standard library function.

How Can Functional Programming Fit Into My Object-Oriented Codebase?

So what does functional programming look like in action in a codebase? Especially in an object-oriented codebase? In a different environment, like the Java virtual machine or the .NET ecosystem, a programmer could drop into a functional language like Scala or F# to implement the parts of their code influenced by functional programming thinking. However, we need a different strategy in PHP since we have features that support functional programming but not a specific tool to do so.

I find inspiration in a concept called “imperative shell, functional core,” which I first learned of Gary Bernhardt of “Destroy All Software.” There, he describes an approach where the core business logic is written in a functional style. This plan means objects are immutable and behavior is written as pure functions, which take some input and return a new object. These objects are then glued together by a thin shell of imperative code which would interact with the outside world, including user input, APIs, or whatever other concerns you have.

The project he uses to illustrate this is a small Ruby-based Twitter client. What would this look like in a current PHP framework like Laravel? Laravel controller and request classes could hold the imperative shell, while the business logic resides in plain PHP objects.

One side effect of writing objects in a functional style is the positive effect on testing. Since your core business logic is now defined in pure functions, they are testable with unit tests, based only on the inputs and outputs, with little setup required. This could even open up your codebase to using mathematical testing tools such as quickcheck, though I have not verified this.

User Interface Programming

User interface programming in the functional programming paradigm takes the form of functional reactive programming (FRP). The idea behind FRP is to move toward a completely event-based model and allowing a user interface to use immutable objects and pure functions to change the UI. We should contrast this to the imperative model of UI development, which mainly takes the form of maintaining state and creating behavior based on that state. FRP requires an event-driven runtime, such as that provided by the ReactPHP library. You can’t react to events without events, after all!

If your UI is written in JavaScript as a single-page app, more options are open to you, such as RxJS. There are even ways to include FRP methods in React and Vue applications.

Concluding Remarks

Let’s review some of the myths that surround functional programming and their responses. Functional programming is not the same as imperative programming. Functional programming is structured, just like object-oriented programming, but aims for different philosophical underpinnings. The foundations of functional programming include immutability, pure functions, and the composability of those pure functions.

You do not need to be working in a functional programming language to benefit from a functional programming paradigm. While a language like OCaml or Haskell may force you into functional programming, PHP has the language features to support you. First-class functions, that is, functions that can be assigned to variables and passed around, are available in PHP. Lambda functions are anonymous, nameless functions and are also available in PHP. You may already be using them as callables in array functions or call_user_func().

The best practices of object-oriented programming are not incompatible with functional programming. The SOLID design principles, which form the base of so much object-oriented thought, can be augmented and refined by a functional programming mindset. As the SOLID design principles force you to refine your class definitions to smaller chunks of behavior, you may even find yourself with a class that is a thin wrapper around a single piece of behavior in a method. This isn’t so different from a pure function!

As a method of attack for including functional programming in your codebase, I’ve offered the idea of an imperative shell around a function core of business logic. Not only does this take some of the SOLID design principles much further than you might usually, but it also has positive knock-on effects for unit testing. Developers can even use functional programming in the UI through functional reactive programming.

Hopefully, this walkthrough will help dispel not only some preconceived notions about functional programming but also show how to use functional programming in your existing codebase. As developers, we can often recognize that multiple perspectives sharpen our analysis of a problem and help us create work that solves the problem while being more understandable and maintainable.


Camilo rose from the swamps of South Florida, where he taught the alligators PHP and Vim. He traveled the Sahara with the Tuaregs of Morocco, and found the SOLID design principles etched into glass beneath the sands. He then moved from Miami to Chattanooga, to teach what he could, and receive the wisdom of the ascetic programmers of Appalachia. Whether or not Camilo received a Computer Science degree from Florida International University remains a hotly contested debate among his biographers, critics, and acolytes. @camdotbio

Tags: ,

Leave a comment

Use the form below to leave a comment: